After weeks of testimony and weeks more of deliberations, the jury delivered its verdict Monday in the matter of Kleiman v. Wright, a much-watched case in which an important computer scientist contested the claims pressed by the estate of another on a matter of more than a little fascination to the world of alternative investments: How did Bitcoin begin? And who owns/controls the huge cash of Bitcoins that the legendary flounder reserved for himself?
The verdict supports the defendant, Craig Wright, on all but one of the counts of the Kleiman estate’s . . .
Continue Reading
Unlock this article instantly, along with the rest of our premium content and benefits including daily/weekly/monthly newsletters.
Monthly
$30
A pay-as-you-go plan to get you started
→ Instantly unlock all new and archived articles
→ Daily, weekly and monthly e-mail newsletters
→ Access to the weekly AW Deal Watch by AW Research
Annual
$300
Required for access to AW Research
Get more for less - 20% discount over monthly
→ Everything in Monthly PLUS:
→ Access to articles and data from AW Research
→ AW Annual Investor Compendium – our comprehensive guide to investor activity, with a ranking of the most active investors for the year and profiles of the top global allocators
